The popular former world number one revealed she had returned a positive result from a routine urine sample taken after losing to Laura Granville in the third round of this year's Wimbledon championships. Hingis insisted she was "100% innocent" and that this was backed up by a negative result on a hair test, which can show whether or not someone has taken cocaine. Scott told BBC Radio 5 Live's Sportsweek programme: "From what I've read in her statement, and my conversation with her representatives, they are putting forward a case partially based on that. "There was some suggestion [it was] not a 100% certainty it was her sample that was tested." But Scott added that it would not be easy for Hingis to prove her innocence. "Once you are found to have a prohibitive substance in your system, the burden of proof then shifts to the player," he said. "If it's in your system you have to prove how it might have got there other than suspicious ways."
Source: BBC Sport
No comments:
Post a Comment